This is the first detailed measurement of the country that became Pennsylvania, and was made by William Penn`s surveyor general, Thomas Holme. All reports of the dissatisfaction that is so common in our colonies have been assiduously suppressed and hidden here in recent years; it seemed to correspond to the views of the American minister [Lord Hillsborough] to make him understand that by his great abilities, all factions were submissive, all oppositions oppressed, and the whole country was reassured. The following play (not the production of a private writer, but the unanimous act of a major American city), recently printed in New England, is republished here that the real state of affairs is known there and that the real causes of this discontent are well understood. This will allow this nation and the other nations of Europe to learn with greater certainty the reasons for a discord that, sooner or later, could have consequences that are all interesting to them. Locke was not the first to propose such rights. English elites attempted to protect the lives, freedoms, and property of English clients long before colonizing North American colonies. In 1215, King Johann signed the Magna Carta – a treaty for the protection of life, liberty and property – “No free person shall be captured and imprisoned. or destroyed in some way. .
except by the legitimate judgment of his peers or by the law of the land. [2] While the Magna Carta only protected English barons who opposed King John in 1215, these protective measures were seen at the time of the American Revolution as the cornerstone of the freedom of people free from all socio-economic conditions – rights still possessed by the people, but reluctantly recognized by King John. [3] A belief in the inalienable or natural rights of all human beings indicates that rights are protected only by the government and not by the government or transmitted. After this cancellation, the colonies withdrew their agreement, insofar as it concerned all other goods, except those for which customs duties were maintained. This has been touted here by the Minister of the Colonies as a triumph; It was seen only as a decent and just measure, which showed the willingness to meet the metropolis in advance on the path of reconciliation, and a willingness to understand so widespread that they could soon relax in the tea article. But the system of customs commissioners, endless officers, with fleets and armies to ensure and enforce these obligations, continues, and they act with great indiscretion and discomfort (unnecessary effort and hindrances to the economy, begin unfair and harassing costumes and harass trade in all its branches, while the minister kept people in a permanent state of irritation with instructions, which did not seem to have any purpose other than the B. to satisfy his private resentment) led to a constant attachment to their intentions in that particular; And the event should be a lesson for ministers not to take risks by reiterating the obstruction of a commercial branch; to the extent that the course and connection of general activity may be disturbed to unforeseeable or imaginable proportions. . . .