These types of questions must be answered for any alternative before a BATNA can be defined in a complex environmental dispute like this. Negotiations are more than the definition of a number of alternatives. Understanding the nuances of negotiation tactics can help improve professional relationships by resolving difficult disputes. Understanding negotiations can also help you assess personal strengths and weaknesses in the face of conflict and learn how to manage your negotiating tendencies. Finally, studying some people`s usual and potentially manipulative negotiation tactics can help negotiators neutralize their effects. The best alternative to a negotiated agreement (BATNA) is the approach taken by a party to negotiations when talks fail and no agreement can be reached. Negotiators Roger Fisher and William Ury marked the term BATNA in their 1981 bestseller “Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In.” A party`s BATNA refers to what a party can rely on if a negotiation proves unsuccessful. Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess have slightly adapted BATNA`s concept to highlight what they call “EATNAs” – popular alternatives to a negotiated deal instead of “better alternatives”. Even if disputants don`t have good options outside of negotiations, they often think they do. (For example, both sides may think that they can prevail in a court or military struggle, even if one side is significantly weaker or if the relative forces are balanced enough that the outcome is highly uncertain.) Nevertheless, perceptions are all that matter when it comes to deciding whether an agreement should be accepted or not.
If a disputant thinks he or she has a better option, he or she will follow that option very often, even if it is not as good as he or she thinks. In negotiation theory, the best alternative to a negotiated agreement or batna (option no deal) refers to the most advantageous alternative approach that a party can adopt in the event of a failure of negotiations and no agreement. The opposite of this option is WATNA (the worst alternative to a negotiated agreement). BATNA could include different situations, such as the suspension of negotiations, the transition to another negotiating partner, the appeal of the Court`s judgment, the holding of strikes and the formation of other forms of alliances. [1] BATNA is the main axis and driving force of a successful negotiator. As a general rule, a party should not accept a solution worse than its BATNA. However, care should be taken to ensure that transactions are valued accurately, taking into account all considerations such as relational value, the present value of money and the likelihood that the other party will be up to its side of the business. These other considerations are often difficult to assess, as they are often based on uncertain or qualitative considerations and not on easily measurable and quantifiable factors. Under these circumstances, you may choose to allude to your own powerful BATNA. We advise clients in our sales negotiation trainings to prevent a buyer from rubbing his nose in his unfortunate negotiating position, so that the buyer is not offended.
. . .